Categories
dab digital radio radio

DAB Digital Radio Sound Quality – Make Your Own Mind Up

This appeared in my inbox, via Google. I have no idea of its provenance whatsoever. It’s a montage of DAB digital radio stations in London (taken yesterday allegedly, but there’s some inconsistencies there). The stated aim is to allow people to make their own mind up between the variety of services and the sound quality that they are broadcast in.

I’m not sure why it’s ordered the way it is (I couldn’t detect a pattern to the order), but most of the “big brand” stations are towards the end of the 15 minutes.

So go have a listen to what DAB Digital Radio in London sounds like, and make your own mind up.

Categories
dab digital radio mobile radio technology

CES – The Radio Perspective

CES Welcome Screen

I was lucky enough to visit The Consumer Electronics Show this year. CES lies at the very heart of the consumer electronics industry, and is a bellwether for the health of consumer spending and consumer interests. I went to go and see how radio fits into this frenetic and fast-moving world.

CES is vast. Truly awe-inspiringly vast. 140,000 delegates, thousands and thousands exhibitors, spread across tens of thousands of hall space across three huge venues. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist, but that’s just peanuts to CES. (with apologies to Douglas Adams). Your chances of seeing it all are slimmer than a whelks chance in a supernova (ditto). But one does ones very best, and wears comfortable shoes (the very best tip I got from reading the blogosphere)

CES has the whole spectrum of consumer electronics providers – from the powerhouses of Samsung, LG, Microsoft, Intel, Motorola, Panasonic – to hundreds and hundreds of booths in a shanty town like arrangement representing the manufacturing communities of China and Taiwan.

Bill Gates (Microsoft) and Paul Otellini (Intel) both devoted large segments of their Keynote speeches to the future of Digital Entertainment (and a quick bash on Guitar Hero for Bill, and a bloke called Slash). Sweeping presentations and brilliant visuals emphasised a seamless entertainment experience in the home, the car and the mobile device. TV – yep. Films – you got ’em. Music – sure thing. Radio… Hello, hello, paging radio – is radio in the house? Apparently not. Oh well. (Otellini’s speech started with a reworking of The Buggles, Video Killed The Radio Star which rather fell over when people realised that video hasn’t actually killed the radio star – but hey, it was a great 80’s start to the show).

So where was radio amongst the vast shiny stands of the world’s major consumer electronics brands. Not present. Largely, I guess, because radio isn’t cutting edge techsexy. (Although I’ve no idea what LG were thinking of when inventing Mobile Pedestrian Handheld “MPH”, and attempting another flogging session of the dead horse of mobile TV). Does Microsoft’s Mediaroom (their IPTV platform) support radio; well, they weren’t sure, but it does do music. How about Microsoft Media Center (sic) – same response. Slightly better news at the Zune stand, where they recognised that lack of streaming support was a bit of a negative, and said there was a roadplan.

Nokia was good. They were demonstrating streaming radio on the N95 and Capital 95.8 streamed faultlessly first time. They talked about bringing together the Visual Radio and Streaming Radio into a single client, which is an exciting prospect. And they really joined in with the enviro/green theme of the show (which must have had a dedicated, and doubtless coal-fired, power plant. Amusingly the local coal lobby was running adverts on the local radio stations about how important and how much cleaner coal was nowadays. Yeah, yeah).

Most of the brand MP3 players have FM radio chucked in as an afterthought. It adds headcount, but nothing very exciting or revolutionary for the radio industry. iRiver were the notable exception, demoing their excellent little B20 device (which has the most comprehensive DAB Digital Radio implementation ever seen, on any device, anywhere) alongside their new W7 and W10 wifi enabled devices. Cowon also demo’ed a MP3+DAB radio unit. But where are Creative, Apple?

So, what about WiMax – to some people, the solution for broadcast radio to the masses? XOHM is the US implementation of WiMax, and they had a great theme driven stand. I asked which theme radio fitted into, and they thought it would probably be the “in the car” theme. But the “in the car” team hadn’t thought about radio. They thought it probably would work because mobile TV works over WiMax, but they promised to have a think about it and get back to me. Seems like the admiration between radio and WiMax isn’t mutual.

So far, the picture looks a bit glum. In a show driven by innovation in consumer electronics, there’s not much radio brings to the party. But let’s go deeper, and talk to the people on the stands.

Most the product managers I was able to talk to were quite interested in the idea of a new kind of radio. In essence, they were saying – give us something new to talk about, and we’ll include it. Logitech and Sonus talked about how their streaming devices can support visualisation, extended information, and interactivity – but no radio station has ever come and asked them about it. I spent some time with the folks from HD Radio, and they talked about how well the iTunes Tagging concept had been received, and demo’ed their natty media player device. Sirius and XM both had impressive stands showing of their range of own brand devices. Radio can do innovation, but apparently only when it’s done by new entrants; it would seem that legacy businesses find it awfully hard to get their heads round anything other than today and yesterday.

The other astonishing hit of the show, in terms of ubiquity, was Digital Picture Frames. They were simply everywhere, despite being described by one wag as “21st Century Lava Lamps”. I predict that an awful lot of homes will have them, and the manufacturers are already trying to differentiate themselves. Some have WiFi, some have Bluetooth, some play MP3s to accompany the pictures. But hang on, if it can play MP3, why not DAB digital radio? Isn’t the Kitchen Radio of the future actually a nifty 7″ digital picture frame, that shows Slideshow when you’re listening to the radio, and shows your favourite pictures when you’re not. Why, hey – now there’s an opportunity. (And a new Slideshow spec will be out shortly).

I was really pleased to be able to meet Jack Schofield of The Guardian in Vegas. We literally bumped into each other on the strip, and used the opportunity to have a really good discussion about DAB Digital Radio. Readers of both our outputs know that my responses have been tart at times, but I hope that the time we spent having an interesting and wide-ranging chat affirms with Jack that there’s no personal animosity, and that everyone on the Digital Radio project has a real passion for radio and that we do the very best we can with the resources and freedoms we have.

One final observation, and this is more to do with radio programming than digital radio. Vegas is the home of the 80’s pop hit. Music is piped everywhere – streets, lobbies, casino floors, restaurants, lifts. Not once, and I mean not one single time in a 6 day stay, did I hear anything other than pop hits from the 1980’s. Nu Shooz, I Can’t Wait; Falco, Der Kommisar; El Debarge, Who’s Johnny…. Given that Vegas is a multi-million dollar industry that is heavily researched, I believe that 80’s pop hits must make people happy, must make people spend lots of money, and therefore must be the sleeper hit format for digital radio in 2008.

There’s a flickr stream of my CES photos here.

Nick travelled with bmi from Manchester to Vegas, who were lovely, even if they caught a 5 hour delay on the way back. You have to love a British airline that serves clotted cream tea, cornish pasties and cottage pie, and brings the tea round before the coffee.

Categories
dab digital radio radio

Core – A DAB Digital Radio Paradox

Core Mug

It was with a bit of a heavy heart that I said “so long (and thanks for all the fish)” to Core last night. The fresh hits station that I launched on 15th November 1999 finally fell silent at midnight. It’s always depressing when a radio brand is outlived by its mugs, stickers and headed notepaper.

Core was intended to be commercial radio’s response to Radio 1 – talking to late teenagers/early twentysomethings entering a more sophisticated and independent phase of their life, but still enjoying fresh hit music pumped out with enthusiasm and energy.

But Core never fulfilled its potential, falling victim to a paradox that looms over any attempt to modernise and evolve radio for the digital media world.

DAB Digital Radio in the UK only really got going towards the end of the later 1990’s when commercial radio committed substantial investment to building networks and starting new radio brands. The confidence to make those bold commitments was fuelled by an unparalleled boom in commercial radio revenues, and radio’s arrival as a darling of the advertising market. Talk of 6% shares of display advertising abounded, and moving to digital would allow commercial radio to compete against the BBC on terms apparently tilted in its favour.

But the very environment that provided the confidence to start digital was also an environment without fear, and without the imperative for change. Simply owning spectrum and putting out cookie-cutter replicas of analogue radio stations and analogue radio sets met the crude targets of “successful digital”. Without the fear of extinction, evolution was never a high item on the agenda, and ideas to move digital stations to something genuinely plugged into peoples’ digital lives just seemed like unnecessary expense and hassle.

Now the tide has turned, and the radio industry is hurting. As predictions of the threat from on-line began to come true, the money that was needed to fund the evolution of radio simply drained away. Commercial Radio frittered away the rich years by not investing enough in digital product evolution. A vast proportion (95%+) of the money allocated to digital was sucked into appalling infrastructure contracts, which are wholly unwarranted, and do not stand up to close inspection. Those costs became the headlines, and endanger the short-term prospects for the platform. They also took valuable cash away from the product evolution which would ultimately have created new value in radio.

As is often the case, the radio industry now faces having to evolve and re-invent itself at the beginning of a wider economic downturn where money is tight, and pressures to cut costs are enormous. As the time horizons for investment returns get shorter, in part driven by the apparent liquidity that private equity offers, the prospects for evolution are not great.

In the UK at least, the hard times for digital are now. There needs to be a wholesale change in the infrastructure cost of digital to ensure its short-term survival and to put it on a sensible economic footing for the future. If the costs of infrastructure can be realigned to reality, it will remove many of the barriers to genuine new entrants to the market, and to true evolution of the radio product. But once those barriers have been removed, it needs a hearts and minds commitment from the radio industry to create something new, something relevant in today’s media environment that can really exploit the tremendous opportunity that free, mobile, cost-effective, digital broadcast spectrum could bring.

Categories
dab digital radio DMB

Frances opts for “T-DMB Audio”

Just time for a quick post. As predicted earlier this year, France has announced today that they have chosen a combination of non-standard “T-DMB Audio” and DRM for their terrestrial digital radio solution.

The decision was made in the face of quite a degree of unified international concern, and only time will tell whether it’s a visionary choice which will catapult French digital radio ahead of those using DAB/DAB+, or one man’s folly which will hinder the digitisation of radio in one of Europe’s largest countries.

Categories
dab digital radio radio

Virgin sticks to the knitting

Elizabeth, Gabrielle and I

Elizabeth, Gabrielle and I by thejulietfiles@ flickr

I don’t think there was much surprise today at the announcement that Virgin Radio Viva will not be launching on the second national multiplex. Certainly far less surprise than there was when it was announced that Virgin was going to launch a station called “Viva” aimed at 30-something females (someone didn’t realise that the name Viva is jinxed).

The justification is that Virgin will focus on guitar driven rock, which makes sense. It’s what listeners understand Virgin to stand for, and why on earth would you want to build the Virgin brand up even more for Richard Branson?

Virgin Radio Groove will also be disappearing, although its carriage on DAB was pretty limited. At least they’ll get some money from auctioning off the EPG slots on Sky.

Viva not appearing is, broadly speaking, good news. DAB didn’t need another service  targeting the eponymous “30-something female”. Clearing that space might allow C4 to do something really interesting that would never have made it through the application stage. It does also highlight the relatively slow-movement of the licensing regime against an increasingly fluid and fast moving radio industry that is beginning to synchronise against Internet time rather than late 1970’s BBC time.

2008 could be a fascinating time for national DAB. C4 could do marvellous things, and DigitalOne (eventually freed from the shackles of BT Movio) could actually compete with new services. I am optomistic that the competition between C4D and D1 will be based not just on new audio services, but on finally making some exciting data services too.

Categories
dab digital radio radio

“Does DAB have a point?”

Fridge Top by Kill Pop @ Flickr

Fridge Top by Kill Pop @ flickr (CC)

There’s a BBC kids TV show which includes an animated sequence featuring a blue cow having the most incredulous imaginary adventures. The verbal cue for this segment is for one cow to turn to another and say, in a bored, drawn-out drawl “Oh.. She’s at it again…”.

Anyway, Jack Schofield’s written another article about DAB/DAB+ etc. in the Guardian today. It’s here, although you’ll probably either have seen it already or have a fair idea of what it says.

Basically, Jack’s postulation (and I know you’ll be shocked to hear this) is that there’s no point to DAB Digital Radio. It’s low sound quality, and you can get the same (in his opinion, mediocre) range of channels from Freeview or a WiFi Radio.

Done the sound quality thing. Jack has a gourmet view, the vast majority of people appear to have Tesco/Asda view. There will be quality platforms for audio, but they’ll appeal to, and have to be funded by, the diminishingly small number of people with sufficient passion for it. So I’m not going to reheat that debate again.

But let’s look at Jack’s view on how you’ll get radio, range of choice and quality of content.

I’m bemused that Jack thinks that the absence or presence of DAB will change the quality of radio programming. If quality is an inverse product of quantity, and technologies like broadband, digital satellite, direct satellite, cable, 3G (… continue at your leisure) allow an unending amount of radio stations to be formed and distributed, how would having or not having DAB make a difference? In a way, by establishing a platform that does have some genuine cost to entry there is an investment threshold that needs to be cleared and that generally means having “a plan”. Think back to the early days of satellite TV and how the “quality press” used to lay into the quality of programming then. Don’t journalists learn from the past? Now that digital TV is squarely established as the primary delivery platform, guess what – there’s more quality programming there.

Last point. DAB as a delivery platform. Jack encourages people to buy a WiFi radio or a Freeview box, because that’s a better investment than DAB. Well, don’t expect to pick your Freeview box and move it around the house, or have it on the kitchen windowsill, as it’s going to need one of those big “aerial” things on top of your house to work properly. So if you are going to use Freeview for radio, be sure to carry a length of RG75 coaxial cable round with you, a 8mm drill bit, some cable clips and a tube of waterproof filler for all the holes you’re going to drill in your window frames. And don’t be disappointed if radio is dropped from the Freeview platform to make way for more TV.

WiFi Radios are certainly fine. I have one, in my kitchen. There’s a specific, unusual, reason for that which certainly (and I can prove this statistically if required) puts me in less than 4% of the population. My kitchen WiFi radio is on for 5-10 minutes a day. But WiFi radio is predicated on a future of unlimited, unmetered, internet bandwidth, which certainly isn’t a given. And it requires a certain Quality of Service to operate correctly, which also isn’t guaranteed. If Internet streaming radio ever made anyone serious money, you can bet that the ISPs in the middle would want to find a way of worming their way into the business plan.

Referring back to my representative British Radio Listener, when presented with a choice of over 6,500 radio stations to listen to, what are they going to do? Yes, they’re going to listen to the ones they know. There is a point where increased choice goes beyond what’s viable for people to understand.

It does appear that Jack lives his life within the confines of his home. I wonder how he envisages people listening to radio on the move in the future? Car? Handheld radio? Travelling away from home? Your WiFi radio will work, apparently for free once you’ve paid for your broadband, within the radius of your WiFi router. But no further.

DAB is not the platform for a high quality audiophilic listening experience. DAB is not the platform to provide over 6,500+ channels of radio stations. It’s not positioned to do that, it’s not marketed to do that, so don’t compare it against those expectations and claim it’s a failure.

DAB is the most pragmatic, cost-effective, universally available technology for radio’s digital future. It’s not the only technology – IP, 3G, Satellite etc. will all have their place – but DAB is the best all rounder for the medium that’s all around us.

 [Bootnote] Happy Birthday to DigitalOne, which launched at 11am on the 15th November 1999, and is widely credited with catalysing the growth of DAB Digital Radio in the UK. DAB is still growing in popularity, which might not be said of “Sporty Spice” who performed the switch-on.

Categories
dab digital radio

DAB – New Ideas Appear

Radio from dash of 589 Eldorado

Radio of dash of 58 Eldorado – cadmanof50s @ flickr (CC)

 

Since the inception of DAB, much has been talked about the platform’s data capabilities. Indeed, quite a lot of the justification for commercial radio engaging so convincingly was that it allowed broadcasters to provide more than just audio services and provided a path to genuinely new revenue streams outside of airtime advertising.

 

What actually happened of course is that everyone piled into making new radio stations, and the available capacity was quickly used up by existing stations, new stations from existing operators and a handful of new entrants. Landgrab meant that muxes were full, and there was no space left for the data services. The critical upside of muxes full of radio stations was to create an absolutely compelling and simple to understand reason for consumers to go and buy a DAB Digital Radio; something that improved audio quality had totally failed to do (understood by consumers, but not compelling).

 

As some of those landgrab stations have fallen by the wayside, and capacity has begun to reappear, some interesting new ideas are slowly beginning to surface (awkward transmission problems notwithstanding).

 

Traffic Radio is a brilliant service. All it does is non-stop rolling travel. Dip in for 5 minutes, and you get the regional travel for your area. Job done. Small, neat but unbelievable effective, and exactly the kind of service that DAB should be enabling.

 

Stations have started experimenting with Slideshow to add visuals to radio, which in my opinion is exactly the kind of innovation that listeners and clients have been expecting from radio for a while.

 

And some receivers are doing really excellent implementations of EPG (Electronic Programme Guide) that allow true Tivo type functionality, which goes a long way towards justifying capacity allocated to that service.

 

Content downloading (or “broadcast podcasting” – em, “brodcasting?”) has been promised by 4 Digital Group (operators of the second national multiplex) as a way of broadening choice of listening and bringing services to listeners that couldn’t otherwise justify a traditional time-linear streaming channel. Similarly, UBC’s Cliq service aims to encourage music purchasing by DAB listeners.

 

Most significant is the arrival of TTI – Traffic and Travel Information – data services. TTI is the information that can keep SatNavs up to date with actual road conditions and events, and other geo-located information. As the ownership of SatNav devices has burgeoned, so has the demand for accurate TTI information, and DAB is (surprise surprise) turning out to be an ideal platform to keep hundreds of thousands of cars updated at the same time. If we see TTI services launches in 2008, expect to see a wave of SatNav devices incorporating DAB. In a way, it’s a very Zen like approach to fixing the problem of getting DAB in the car; we’re going to get where we want to be, but not down the route we thought we’d travel.

 

So the apparent razing of some of the DAB landscape has actually been catalytic, allowing some new green shoots of ideas to popup where once they would have been smothered by big fat old radio stations. Radio is still vitally important, but it doesn’t have the be the only thing that drives DAB on.

Categories
dab digital radio radio real life technology

Long range radar calibration available

Radio At The Edge Flier

This is just a quick reminder that if you’re the kind of person who enjoys debate and discussion about the effect of new technology on good old radio, then Radio At The Edge is a realworld event you might also enjoy.

RATE is the Radio Academy’s annual conference looking at how radio is being disrupted by technology, and it’s usually a sell-out, so if it’s of interest get it in your diary now and contact mandy@radioacademy.org to book your place.

Categories
dab digital radio

Build Smaller, Build Cheaper, Build for a Future

Kaukau Transmitter, Wellington, New Zealand

Kaukau transmitter by Phillpc @ Flickr (CC Licence)

Autumn is the conference season in Europe, and I’ve had a busy couple of months talking about DAB Digital Radio and meeting my colleagues from the digital radio industry around the world. A particular highlight was the conference “Quo Vadis Digital Radio”, which was held in Ingolstadt (near Munich in Germany) and organised by the BLM (Bayrische Landeszentrale für neue Medien / Bayern New Media Centre). Germany has had a very difficult relationship with DAB, mainly because of enthusiasm to build substantial networks that was never matched by the broadcasters’ enthusiasm to use them.

 

I wanted to use the opportunity to explain how the UK’s extended lead in DAB uptake means that we’re uncovering issues and problems earlier than other countries. Whilst it’s right to remind people that DAB can be successful, it’s far more valuable to explain what we would have done differently with the benefit of hindsight. We can see back down a road other countries are about to start travelling along, so it seems only fair to tell them where the axle-breaking potholes are.

 

There’s a copy of my presentation (German / English) to read, but the area I felt was most radical was to question how we’d rolled out Digital Radio in the UK, whether or not it was representing a good investment for radio companies.

 

 To briefly recap; the incentive for many stations to migrate to digital was the promise of an uncontested analogue licence renewal. In order to allow each station to have this renewal, the digital radio licence areas were carved up to fit existing analogue licence areas.

 

However a number of other factors conspired to create a situation where the greatest danger to the success of DAB in the UK at the moment comes from the network itself.

 

Firstly, the coverage areas were ambitiously planned to fit together using only 5 frequencies, which is incredibly demanding reuse. In some places two multiplexes using the same frequency have official coverage areas just 10-20 miles apart. Secondly, the digital areas were shaped to fit existing analogue coverage, which is achieved from single high-power transmitters. Matching that shape in digital is far more complicated.

 

The third issue, in my mind, is the most concerning. Commercial Radio has never been responsible for planning or implementing its own transmission. Since the days of ILR, transmission was outsourced – first to the IBA, and then onto its privatised successor, ntl: / Arqiva. There are very few people in commercial radio who have a deep knowledge of radio planning, mast building, transmitter commissioning and so on. We rely heavily on a commercial company (and now about to become a monopoly) to provide this essential service. Whilst the costs for establishing FM were well established, most people in the radio industry were trusting on guidance from Arqiva to give a true picture of DAB transmission costs. If you offer a hungry dog meat……

 

It’s becoming clear (particularly as radio suffers from an advertising recession) that the cost of our networks is out of kilter to the coverage breadth and quality that they achieve, and out of kilter with where demand for Digital Radio listening is. Trying to fix that problem looks a bit like unscrambling eggs.

 

Some of our network cost is inflated because the coverage requirements are unrealistically demanding. We probably shouldn’t have been promising 70%-80% coverage on day one, and The Radio Authority should probably have been more realistic with frequency reuse so that we could have fewer, higher power transmitters. Those things can be resolved, probably by changing digital coverage areas, amalgamating multiplexes and rejigging frequency use.

 

But undeniably some of our network cost is inflated because there was a chance to have a technology party at which somebody else was picking up the bar bill. And now the radio companies are nursing a hangover and an overdraft, and it’s not very funny. One of the benefits of consolidation in the radio industry is that the commercial operators are now getting big enough and confident enough to retake control of more of the technology, and make sure more of the money goes on achieving good quality coverage for listeners, and investment in development of digital radio services.

 

So my messages to my colleagues in other countries who are just starting off down the bumpy path of DAB is to be restrained in network builds, and question in detail where the money is going. Most of the components of a DAB network are the same as an FM network, so why should they cost any different? Network cost is going to consume a lot of your digital investment, and a lot of your profit for a good while yet, so squeeze every cent out of it, and do exactly what’s required to make DAB grow reliably; maybe with smaller  initial coverage, but better quality and at lower costs.

 

In the meanwhile, DAB will continue to grow and evolve in the UK, but hopefully it will do so faster and in more interesting ways now that the broadcasters have realised the value of being more in control of their transmissions.

Categories
dab digital radio mobile

Great Rumour – Interesting Outcome

iPhone + Jahah

iphone plus jajah by jahah @ flickr 

It appears my scepticism about the rumours of the iPod to include Digital Radio was well founded. How on earth the real announcement got extrapolated to that is quite impossible to believe, but a salutary tale none-the-less.

The actual news is that the iPhone now has WiFi access to the iTunes store. (How clever not to go bunging up the tiny datafootpath of GPRS that is the iPhone’s sole contact with the real world). I’m not that impressed. Same application, different bearer, big deal.

The interesting stuff comes in the last breaths. Apple have linked up with Starbucks. A meeting of the brands – can you imagine the ponytails, chino jeans and lattés in those meetings? Starbucks, you might be aware, is also hopping on the music bandwagon by making big its policy of playing music in its stores. (I’m sure MacDonalds have done that for years?). But here’s the big revolutionary “oh my god, how clever are Apple?!” idea.

Starbucks will tell Apple the song that’s currently playing the store… and the last ten songs played. You can download them (using the WiFi in all Starbucks) with just a couple of clicks.

Wow. Wish I’d thought of that.

(Actually – wish I’d thought of taking the idea to Apple).

Now I wonder if Apple is interested in doing the same with radio stations, or if we’re just simply not cool enough for them? (Note to self – buy new Chinos, grow ponytail, drink more latté).